January 21, 2026

Reorganization Framework

This framework explains how our reorganization supports student achievement, strengthens shared leadership, and simplifies how work gets done— while advancing our financial stability and long-term sustainability. This is presented as a framework for our general future direction. Some details are subject to change and further discussion with those closest to the work.

Why this work: By flattening layers, clarifying responsibilities, and reducing duplication, we bring leadership closer to day-to-day work and improve coordination—while delivering more than $1.7M in institutional savings and protecting what matters most for students.

Framework & Principles

Guided by Welcome, Weave, Widen, this reorganization reinforces our commitment to our mission, our students, and our broader community. By simplifying our structure and strengthening shared leadership, we position decisions and daily work to more directly support student success and the full university.

WELCOME — Clarity and support in our work
  • Clear roles and decision pathways reduce handoffs and improve efficiency.
  • More transparency and communication means fewer surprises during transitions.
  • Leadership closer to the work enables faster support and solutions.
WEAVE — Collaborating across boundaries
  • Break down silos and solve problems across units more often.
  • Link planning to daily practice (staffing, scheduling, priorities).
  • Use a university-first lens—what moves the whole institution forward.
WIDEN — Expanding leadership and ownership
  • More people empowered to shape solutions—not just receive decisions.
  • Clearer connection between each person’s work and university progress.
  • A flatter structure supports wiser resource use and stability.
Cultural Anchor
Wolves First — we weave our strengths so the whole university rises.
University-first Clarity Coordination Shared leadership

“Wolves First” Decision Code

  • If it’s good for my unit but bad for the university, it’s a no.
  • If it’s neutral for my unit but good for the university, it’s a yes.
  • If it’s hard for my unit but necessary for the university, we find the way together.

Five Strategic Lanes

The reorganization clarifies leadership lanes so work is coordinated, responsibilities are clear, and decisions support student success and institutional sustainability.

Operations
Facilities, auxiliaries, finance/budget functions, bursar/cashier, IT infrastructure & cybersecurity, and event/media production—coordinated as one system.
Student Thriving
Student experience, enrollment, persistence—kept central with streamlined leadership and tighter coordination across the student lifecycle.
Academic Affairs
Academic supports aligned so students experience help earlier and more seamlessly—connected to pathways and classroom experience.
People & Culture
Clearer employee pathways; stronger coordination across HR, DEIB, Title IX/ADA-related employee supports; healthier day-to-day climate during change.
Marketing/Communications & Advancement
Stronger alignment of message, reputation, relationships, enrollment, and philanthropy—clarifying strategy vs. production.

Lane Detail: Operations

Operations is being structured so the work that keeps the university running functions as one coordinated system under the Vice President for Operations (VPO) as a direct report to the President—supporting fewer handoffs, clearer roles, faster solutions, and stronger stability.

What’s changing under the VPO

  • Auxiliary Services
  • Facilities & Operations
  • Administrative services, financial planning, budgets, and fiscal affairs organized under a CFO
  • Bursar/Cashier’s Office
  • IT & Innovation split into two focused leaders:
    • Technology, Infrastructure & Cybersecurity — networks, systems, cybersecurity, enterprise reliability
    • Digital Innovation, Media Services & Events — media production, event production, conference & event management
Operations FAQs
  • Is this just cost-cutting? It supports savings, but it’s also about better coordination and stronger service.
  • Who owns housing? Operations owns housing operations; Student Affairs owns the residence-life student experience—coordinated so students experience one system.
  • Does this reduce the importance of IT? No—this clarifies it. Infrastructure/cybersecurity is a focused lane dedicated to reliability and protection.
  • Why move events/conference services with production? Successful events require planning, staging, run-of-show, and technical delivery—core production strengths.

Lane Detail: Student Thriving

A Student Thriving lane keeps the student experience, enrollment, and persistence central to university decisions. In a streamlined model, recruitment and retention leadership is consolidated to reduce management layers and strengthen coordination across the student lifecycle.

Leadership roles and scope

  • Associate Vice President & Dean of Student Affairs — keeps the daily student experience coordinated and responsive.
  • Associate Vice President for Enrollment and Executive Associate to the President — integrates recruitment and retention; removes barriers that impact persistence.
Why this design: Enrollment and retention are central to mission and sustainability. Consolidation reduces handoffs, strengthens coordination, and keeps daily recruitment and persistence work connected to presidential and academic priorities.

Lane Detail: Academic Affairs (Provost Lane)

Academic supports are being aligned so students experience help in a clearer, more connected way—especially early in their time at WestConn. Advising, first-year experience, tutoring/mentoring coordination, writing support, career services, honors, and access supports are strongest when linked to pathways and the classroom experience.

Provost’s Office structure (high level)

  • Associate Provost for Institutional Effectiveness & Analytics and Academic Innovation & Research
  • Associate Provost for Academic Student Support Services
  • Deans remain direct reports:
    • Macricostas School of Arts & Sciences
    • Ancell School of Business
    • School of Professional Studies
    • School of Visual & Performing Arts
  • Other direct reports remain: Library Services, Carol Hawkes Center for Excellence in Learning & Teaching, University Registrar
  • The School of Graduate, International, and Career Studies will transition to Graduate Studies, overseen by an Associate Provost. Career will remain in Academic Affairs and International Servies will move to Enrollment Management.
  • Next phase: academic synergies and alignment guided by deans and faculty
  • Academic Affairs FAQs
    • Will students notice a big change? Not in a disruptive way—the goal is that support feels more connected and easier to navigate.
    • Who supports graduate programs? The redistribuition of the Graduate, International, and Career Services School is only an administratiev and cost-savings effort. The university's committment to graduate is key to our future growth and will need greater coordination and investment. Graduate Studies will continue under Academic Affairs, reporting to an Associate Provost. Academic leadership/curriculum/advising: Provost/Deans/Graduate Program Coordinators—working closely together. Recruitment/outreach: AVP Recruitment/Admissions/Outreach.

    Lane Detail: People & Culture

    Culture doesn’t happen by accident—it’s shaped by how we hire, support, develop, communicate, and resolve issues with consistency and care. A People & Culture division creates clearer employee pathways, improves coordination, and supports a healthier day-to-day climate during change.

    What’s changing

    • Create a People & Culture division with HR and DEIB leadership in closer coordination.
    • Employee accommodation support and coordination moves into People & Culture (ADA coordination for employees).

    Why this design

    • Clearer pathways: employees know where to go and what to expect.
    • Better coordination across related responsibilities reduces confusion and improves follow-through.
    • Consistency and fairness in accommodation coordination.
    • Healthier climate during change: structure matters—but how we treat people matters more.
    People & Culture FAQs
    • Why create People & Culture now? Because change asks a lot of people. This improves clarity, coordination, and support.
    • Is this adding bureaucracy? No—this reduces the runaround by clarifying lanes and coordination.
    • Who handles accommodations? Students: AccessAbility Services in Student Affairs. Employees: People & Culture (ADA coordination for employees).

    Lane Detail: Marketing/Communications & Advancement

    We are strengthening two connected efforts: how we tell our story and how we build relationships that move the university forward. A university can’t grow enrollment, deepen partnerships, or inspire philanthropy without consistent communication and intentional relationship-building.

    What’s changing

    • Strategic Marketing, Communications & Public Relations becomes a direct report to the President.
    • Separate production from strategy: production; event production; conference & event management sits under Operations with a production-focused leader; strategy sits with MarCom.
    • Advancement/Foundation alignment closer to the President: eliminate VP of Institutional Advancement; Executive Director for Institutional Advancement & WCSU Foundation becomes a direct report to the President.

    Why this matters

    • Enrollment and philanthropy depend on trust—people support what they understand and believe in.
    • One clear voice improves recruitment, community relations, PR, and government engagement.
    • Coordinated relationship-building helps donors, alumni, partners, and community stakeholders experience WCSU as aligned and responsive.
    MarCom & Advancement FAQs
    • Is this “just marketing”? No—it’s about clarity and trust in communication and relationship-building.
    • Why separate production from strategy? Different skills. Production is technical delivery; strategy is message, audience, and reputation.
    • Why remove the VP of Advancement? To tighten alignment to institutional priorities and strengthen presidential connection to key relationships.
    • Does MarCom control everything? No—MarCom coordinates the university’s message and external relations for consistency; units remain essential partners and subject-matter leaders.

    Continuity: Public Safety and Athletics

    • Chief of Police remains a direct report to the President (including emergency management and campus safety coordination).
    • Athletics Director remains a direct report to the President.

    Quick FAQs (General)

    What is the main goal of the reorganization?
    To simplify how work gets done, bring leadership closer to day-to-day needs, strengthen shared leadership, and support student success—while improving sustainability and reducing duplication.
    How does this connect to Welcome, Weave, Widen?
    Welcome (clarity, fewer handoffs), Weave (coordination, Wolves First decisions), and Widen (expanded leadership and ownership) are the operating principles for the structure.
    How does this connect to financial sustainability?
    The design reduces duplication and clarifies lanes to improve efficiency and service, while delivering more than $1.7M in institutional savings and protecting core student-facing priorities.
    Note: This page is a consolidated internal framework for clarity and shared understanding. As implementation continues, operational details may be refined to improve coordination and service.
    The Planning Process

    Organization Structure:  

    We plan to set up three groups to implement the process. The five-person Process Management Group (PMG) appointed by me will conduct the administrative tasks to manage the process and real-time communications. The next larger group with 8-10 members will be the Steering Committee (SC) that will collect, summarize, synthesize and craft the final strategic plan based on the multiple rounds of information gathering, feedback, consultations and discussions conducted at various events planned throughout the process. The Steering Committee will be a body of various stakeholders — faculty, staff, students, alumni — who choose to send their representatives as members. Finally, the largest group that will engage in the process is the Strategic Planning Group (SPG) a collection of various subcommittees and working groups that correspond to various strategic plan domains.  

    Process Management Group (PMG)

    AVP (IEP) – John Osae-Kwapong 

    Director of Communications & Marketing – Marcia Firsick 

    Presidential Assistant – Charmaine Lloyd 

    Instructional Designer – Aura Lippincott 

    Professor Ancell School of Business – Mohinder Dugal 

    Steering Committee (SC)

    Chair/Co-Chair – Michelle Brown & Julie Perrelli

    Senate President – Jeffrey Schlicht

    Dean of School of Visual & Performing Arts – Brian Vernon 

    Dean of Student Success & Engagement – Julie Perrelli

    VP of Enrollment Mgmt. and Student Affairs – Jay Murray 

    Financial Administrator – Inita Mix 

    Faculty – Joshua Rosenthal

    Associate Dean, Library Services – Veronica Kenausis

    Athletics – Lori Mazza

    Student – Kristina Caravetta    

    Alumni Board – Tom Crucitti 

    Dean of Macricostas School of Arts & Sciences – Dr. Michelle Brown  

    Sub Committees

    Sub Committee 1: Academic Excellence

    Chair/Co-Chair – Wynn Gadkar-Wilcox

    Athletics – Alex Harrison

    Faculty – Carol Huang

    Dean of Professional Studies – Joan Palladino 

    Celt Director – Leslie Lindenauer 

    One Faculty – Wynn Gadkar-Wilcox 

     

    Sub Committee 2: Financial Sustainability

    Chair/Co-Chair – Melissa Stephens & Deanna-Cibery Schaab

    UPBC Chair – Jim Donegan

    Director of Financial Aid – Melissa Stephens  

    Budget Director – Mufu Weng

    Facilities – Deanna Cibery-Schaab 

    Faculty – Zuohong Pan 

     

    Sub Committee 3: DEI & Belonging

    Chair/Co-Chair – Scott Towers & Jessica Coronel

    HR – Michele Ribeiro Cazorla

    Faculty – Carina Bandhauer 

    Title IX – Scott Towers

    Faculty – Chair of Social Work, Karen McLean

    Student – Maia Quirk 

    Associate Director of Pre-Collegiate Access – Jessica Coronel

    Director of Counseling Services – Ree Gunter

     

    Sub Committee 4: Transparency & Collaborative Decision Making

    Chair/Co-Chair – Anna Malavisi & Maribeth Griffin

    Faculty – Anna Malavisi

    Student – Rebecca Wozniak 

    Faculty – Adam Brewer 

    IT – John DeRosa

    Director of Residential Programs & Staff – Maribeth Griffin

     

    Sub Committee 5: Community Partnerships

    Chair/Co-Chair – Fred Cratty & Yaseen Hayajneh

    Foundation Board Members

    Interim Dean of Ancell School of Business – Yaseen Hayajneh

    Faculty – Mitch Wagener 

    Director of Career Services – Kathleen Lindenmayer 

    Director of Pre-Collegiate Access – Rob Pote 

    Director of Career Academy Partnerships – Brent Dean

    Human Resources – Fred Cratty

    Alumni Board – Ray Lubus

    Mayor’s Office Representation

    Foundation Board Member – Nelson Merchan