Updated: March 12, 2026

Mid-Year FY26 Budget Update

This update provides a transparent mid-year FY26 budget outlook and connects it to our broader Western Rising – Commitment 1: Strengthening Foundations work. We are addressing both immediate FY26 pressures and a multi-year structural gap through a disciplined plan to reduce the deficit by FY30 and rebuild reserves to sustainable levels This report remains intentionally conservative and pre-mitigation. It reflects where we land without additional corrective actions beyond those already underway.

Overview

President Bernal is sharing this update to provide a transparent view of where WestConn stands at mid-year and how the university is responding. This mid-year report is intentionally conservative and pre-mitigation—meaning it reflects where we land if we do not add further corrective actions beyond what is already approved.

Key message: This is not an alarm. It’s an early heads-up so we can stay proactive, disciplined, and aligned. The primary drivers are within our control—hiring, overtime, discretionary spending, and aid strategy. Acting early reduces reliance on reserves and helps us avoid surprises later.
What's new since January:
  • Clear FY30 deficit-reduction pathway under Commitment 1
  • Quantified cost controls already underway (~$3.9M)
  • Expanded focus on enrollment mix and net tuition strategy
  • Formation of a Presidential Budget Advisory Group
  • Integration of reserve rebuild targets into the plan
Budget Advisory Group (Western Rising – Commitment 1)

The President, Provost Hegedus, and Interim CFO Ron Thomas are forming a Budget Advisory Group within Western Rising – Commitment 1: Strengthening Foundations. The group will provide regular review and advice on budget decisions and will include shared governance and union participation.


The Big Picture

WestConn continues to face a structural gap between what we bring in each year and what it costs to operate—driven primarily by people, benefits, and fixed operating needs. Strengthening our foundations is how we build the institutional resilience to stay focused on our mission. We are now moving from understanding the structural gap to executing a multi-year plan to eliminate it and build long-term resilience.


What FY25 Tells Us

FY25 ended in a strong position—largely because of one-time System Office support. That support prevented a much larger deficit and gave us breathing room to do deeper, structural work with shared leadership and better controls. This one-time support created the runway to begin structural changes that are now underway through Commitment 1.

One-time support
  • $17.6M ARPA funding (one-time)
  • $6.6M System Office bridge support (one-time)
FY25 outcome
  • Planned for a $4.5M surplus
  • Ended with a $5.8M surplus, mostly due to reduced spending in OE (operating expenses)

What We Planned for in FY26 (Approved Plan)

Our FY26 spending plan assumed:

  • Approximately $11.9M in System Office bridge support
  • $1.5M in planned reserve use

With those items included, FY26 looked essentially balanced (~+$400K). Without them, the underlying structural gap would have been significant. FY26 was designed as a bridge year—using one-time support to stabilize operations while structural solutions are implemented.


What We’re Seeing at Mid-Year (Key Changes)

Even with some positive signs (enrollment performing around what was expected; auxiliaries balancing out), the outlook is tighter than the original plan. Key drivers include:

  • Revenue approximately $0.9M below plan
  • More full-time employees than budgeted: 492 actual vs. 481 planned (11 over plan)
  • Salary expense approximately $2.6M above plan
  • Fringe/benefits approximately $0.9M above plan
  • Institutional financial aid approximately $1.4M above plan, reducing net tuition
Bottom line: Without one-time funding and use of reserve, we would end with an estimated $18.2M deficit. Net effect: projected reserve use increases from $1.5M planned to approximately $4.4M or more.

Mid-Year Snapshot (in dollars)

Category Spending Plan Mid-Year Difference
Revenue 112,732,636 111,819,918 (912,718)
FT Employee Expense (49,218,231) (51,801,459) (2,583,228)
Fringe (15,414,640) (16,339,837) (925,197)
Institutional Financial Aid (7,536,887) (8,924,314) (1,387,427)
Use of Reserves (1,500,000) (4,407,091) (2,907,091)

What’s Driving the Change

  • Enrollment mix: Part-time enrollment below projections is the primary driver of the revenue shortfall.
  • Financial aid strategy: Increased merit investment improved competitiveness but requires tighter modeling to protect net tuition.
  • Personnel costs: Higher-than-planned staffing levels (492 vs. 481) due to planning assumptions around attrition and critical roles.
Why “Strengthening Foundations” matters here

Strengthening foundations is the unglamorous work—systems, controls, staffing discipline, and smart planning—that protects our ability to deliver for students. Stability is “we can stand.” Resilience is “we can absorb pressure, adapt, and keep moving forward without losing who we are.” This update is part of that move from stability to resilience.


What This Means (and What It Does Not Mean)

  • This is not an alarm. It’s an early heads-up so we can stay proactive, disciplined, and aligned.
  • The main drivers are within our control: hiring, overtime, discretionary spending, and aid strategy.
  • Acting early reduces reliance on reserves and helps us avoid surprises later.

How We Are Closing the Gap (FY26–FY30)

WCSU is implementing a multi-year plan to eliminate the structural deficit and restore financial sustainability by FY30.

Mitigation already underway (~$3.9M):

  • Administrative reorganization (~$1.7M)
  • Overtime strategy (~$750K)
  • Operating expense reductions (~$1.5M)

Additional focus areas:

  • Net tuition improvement (enrollment mix, retention, pricing strategy)
  • New revenue (non-credit, partnerships, facilities use)
  • Workforce redesign and shared services
  • Academic portfolio alignment
  • Procurement, energy, and operational efficiencies
  • State/system advocacy and policy alignment

This work is coordinated through Western Rising – Commitment 1 and supported by monthly monitoring and shared governance engagement.


Immediate Actions Underway

Administrative reorganization
To realize better synergies and reduce overhead. Delivering structural savings and reducing duplication (~$1.7M).
Additional hiring reviews
Reviewing most new hires with a focus on mission-critical needs and a full cost picture. Cancelled/paused searches and strengthened approval process tied to full cost analysis. Reduced discretionary spending
Reduced discretionary / OE spending
Targeting deferrable, non-essential, low-ROI spending with the goal of spending less than last year. Targeting permanent reductions (~$1.5M).
Overtime controls (Facilities / Public Safety)
Keeping overtime at last year’s levels through schedule adjustments and coverage strategies. New strategy to align with prior-year levels (~$750K impact).
Financial aid review
Institutional financial aid is above plan (~$1.4M), reflecting a deliberate increase in merit-based awards to improve competitiveness and student profile. The next phase is refining our model—strengthening discount-rate guardrails and aligning aid strategy with long-term net tuition sustainability.
Monthly monitoring
Regular check-ins to make timely decisions and lock in progress.
Budget Advisory Group
Creation of a Presidential Budget Advisory Group within Western Rising – Commitment 1, including shared governance representation.
Continued system and state advocacy
Ongoing engagement to advance sustainable solutions.

Reserves and Financial Health

Where we are:

Current unrestricted funds are projected to decline to approximately $7.3M (~19 days of coverage) without additional mitigation.

Why this matters:

This is below the 30-day benchmark and reinforces the need for disciplined action. Below, under Additional Resources, is the plan approved by the Board of Regents in March 2026.

Our plan:

  • Reduce reliance on reserves in FY26–FY27
  • Execute the multi-year deficit reduction plan
  • Establish clear reserve rebuild targets with Board visibility

Reserves are not a strategy. They are the buffer that protects students and operations while we implement structural solutions.

Workbook Review: Where to Start

You do not need to read every tab to understand the story. If you look at just these two, you’ll see the full arc:

Wk #7A FY25 Actual
Last year’s outcome and the impact of one-time support.
Wk #7B FY26 Projection
The current mid-year forecast (conservative, pre-mitigation). Key lines: Revenue, Full-time salary, Fringe, Institutional aid, Use of reserves.
View Budget Workbook (WCSU login required)
Access is limited to users with WCSU credentials (view-only).

Additional Resources

FAQs

What does “pre-mitigation” mean?
It means the projection reflects where we land without adding additional corrective actions beyond what is already approved. We use a conservative view so we can act early and reduce risk.
Why is reserve use increasing?
Because the mid-year outlook is tighter than the original plan due to a combination of lower revenue than planned and higher than planned spending in full-time salary/benefits and institutional aid. Acting early helps limit the reliance on reserves.
What does “bridge year” mean?
FY26 relies on one-time support while structural fixes are implemented.
Why invest in innovation during a deficit?
Tie to pilot → prove → institutionalize model.
What can employees do to help?
Stay aligned on spending discipline; follow overtime and hiring guidance; bring forward ideas that protect student experience while improving efficiency; and engage in shared leadership conversations that help us make strong “Wolves First” decisions.
Questions? Email: president@wcsu.edu
Note: Figures shown reflect a conservative mid-year projection and may change as corrective actions and monitoring continue.
The Planning Process

Organization Structure:  

We plan to set up three groups to implement the process. The five-person Process Management Group (PMG) appointed by me will conduct the administrative tasks to manage the process and real-time communications. The next larger group with 8-10 members will be the Steering Committee (SC) that will collect, summarize, synthesize and craft the final strategic plan based on the multiple rounds of information gathering, feedback, consultations and discussions conducted at various events planned throughout the process. The Steering Committee will be a body of various stakeholders — faculty, staff, students, alumni — who choose to send their representatives as members. Finally, the largest group that will engage in the process is the Strategic Planning Group (SPG) a collection of various subcommittees and working groups that correspond to various strategic plan domains.  

Process Management Group (PMG)

AVP (IEP) – John Osae-Kwapong 

Director of Communications & Marketing – Marcia Firsick 

Presidential Assistant – Charmaine Lloyd 

Instructional Designer – Aura Lippincott 

Professor Ancell School of Business – Mohinder Dugal 

Steering Committee (SC)

Chair/Co-Chair – Michelle Brown & Julie Perrelli

Senate President – Jeffrey Schlicht

Dean of School of Visual & Performing Arts – Brian Vernon 

Dean of Student Success & Engagement – Julie Perrelli

VP of Enrollment Mgmt. and Student Affairs – Jay Murray 

Financial Administrator – Inita Mix 

Faculty – Joshua Rosenthal

Associate Dean, Library Services – Veronica Kenausis

Athletics – Lori Mazza

Student – Kristina Caravetta    

Alumni Board – Tom Crucitti 

Dean of Macricostas School of Arts & Sciences – Dr. Michelle Brown  

Sub Committees

Sub Committee 1: Academic Excellence

Chair/Co-Chair – Wynn Gadkar-Wilcox

Athletics – Alex Harrison

Faculty – Carol Huang

Dean of Professional Studies – Joan Palladino 

Celt Director – Leslie Lindenauer 

One Faculty – Wynn Gadkar-Wilcox 

 

Sub Committee 2: Financial Sustainability

Chair/Co-Chair – Melissa Stephens & Deanna-Cibery Schaab

UPBC Chair – Jim Donegan

Director of Financial Aid – Melissa Stephens  

Budget Director – Mufu Weng

Facilities – Deanna Cibery-Schaab 

Faculty – Zuohong Pan 

 

Sub Committee 3: DEI & Belonging

Chair/Co-Chair – Scott Towers & Jessica Coronel

HR – Michele Ribeiro Cazorla

Faculty – Carina Bandhauer 

Title IX – Scott Towers

Faculty – Chair of Social Work, Karen McLean

Student – Maia Quirk 

Associate Director of Pre-Collegiate Access – Jessica Coronel

Director of Counseling Services – Ree Gunter

 

Sub Committee 4: Transparency & Collaborative Decision Making

Chair/Co-Chair – Anna Malavisi & Maribeth Griffin

Faculty – Anna Malavisi

Student – Rebecca Wozniak 

Faculty – Adam Brewer 

IT – John DeRosa

Director of Residential Programs & Staff – Maribeth Griffin

 

Sub Committee 5: Community Partnerships

Chair/Co-Chair – Fred Cratty & Yaseen Hayajneh

Foundation Board Members

Interim Dean of Ancell School of Business – Yaseen Hayajneh

Faculty – Mitch Wagener 

Director of Career Services – Kathleen Lindenmayer 

Director of Pre-Collegiate Access – Rob Pote 

Director of Career Academy Partnerships – Brent Dean

Human Resources – Fred Cratty

Alumni Board – Ray Lubus

Mayor’s Office Representation

Foundation Board Member – Nelson Merchan